Get a quote
News

Smart motorways called into question – again

by Antony Ingram
19 January 2021 2 min read
Smart motorways called into question – again
Photo: RAC

The UK’s smart motorways are once again under scrutiny as a Sheffield coroner has declared them a major contributing factor in a fatal accident on the M1.

Two men were killed on a stretch of the M1 in South Yorkshire when a lorry driver crashed into the pair as they were exchanging details after an accident. The hard shoulder was at the time serving as the inside lane on a section of smart motorway, in 2009.

How much is your car to insure? Find out in four easy steps.
Get a quote

The driver of the lorry was jailed last year after pleading guilty to death by careless driving, but the latest inquest has ruled that the lack of a proper hard shoulder was also a significant factor in the tragedy. Coroner David Urpeth said smart motorways without a proper hard shoulder carry an “ongoing risk of future deaths”.

The crash was one of a number of accidents that have taken place on the active inside lane of a smart motorway. In September 2018, Naris Begum died when her stranded vehicle was hit by another driver, again on the M1 in South Yorkshire. In that case, the coroner determined that Highways England had not closed the lane to traffic in the 16 minutes leading up to the impact, and then took a further six minutes to shut it down. The Daily Mail reported in November 2020 that 44 people have died on smart motorways in the previous five years.

Highways England has said it will “carefully consider” any further comments raised by the coroner after the latest inquest, but the news will add to the concern of motorists who view smart motorways as unsafe – particularly given safety concerns have been raised by motoring organisations including the AA and RAC since their introduction.

Smart motorways pose danger to drivers
Photo: Aniczkania / Shutterstock

Smart motorways are required to have a small refuge every 1.5 miles, and overhead gantries can warn when a lane is closed, but delays can occur before warnings are displayed when a lane is obstructed. And as safety bodies have repeatedly noted, drivers are rarely able to choose where their car may break down or where to pull over after an accident.

For drivers of classic vehicles, smart motorways are an ongoing concern. Motorway speeds can demand more of drivetrains and running gear than low-speed driving. Older vehicles designed before the 1996 introduction of Euro NCAP vehicle safety assessments – which have helped improve occupant and pedestrian protection – lack modern crash structures and active and passive safety features that might at least offer some protection from other traffic in the event of an accident.

In 2019, an RAC survey highlighted the shortcomings of smart motorways, after 23 per cent of drivers admitted to disregarding the red X indicating a lane is closed to traffic.

Nicholas Lyes, the RAC’s head of roads policy, called on Highways England to accelerate safety improvements to smart motorways. “Sadly, there appears to have been precious little progress with retrofitting [of stopped vehicle detection technology] to date considering this was announced last March. While Highways England is considering a national programme to install more SOS areas on the existing network, we’d prefer them to commit to this fully so all refuge areas are consistent distances apart.”

In the event of a vehicle breaking down, Highways England advises stranded motorists and passengers to exit a vehicle on the passenger side, and to remain behind the barrier at a safe distance from the stranded vehicle.

You may also like

New Range Rover Sport debuts – with all-electric version to follow in 2024
New Range Rover Sport debuts – with all-electric version to follow in 2024
Aston Martin Vantage Shooting Brake
First Aston Martin Virage Shooting Brake heads to auction
Ferrari SP48 Unica
Ferrari SP48 Unica is the latest one-off from the Prancing Horse
A story about

Your weekly dose of car news from Hagerty in your inbox

Comments

  • Andy Gill says:

    Anybody with 2 brain cells could have predicted this outcome, with no hard shoulder. So why were they EVER considered to be an acceptable solution to congested motorways ? Whom ever thought this ridiculous use of existing tarmac ought to be made to travel in lane 1 for 10 hours a day for the rest of their dumb lives.

  • Mark Jones says:

    I’ve yet to meet anyone who thinks ‘smart’ motorways are a good idea, and yet the Highways Agency keeps rolling them out

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

More on this topic
Hagerty Newsletter
Get your weekly dose of car news from Hagerty UK in your inbox
Share

Thanks for signing up!

Your request will be handled as soon as possible